Converting to reverse shoulder arthroplasty from primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty and fracture hemiarthroplasty: a radiographic and clinical outcome analysis at 8-years.

INTRODUCTION: Revision shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging. One of the main considerations for surgeons is the type of implant that was placed in the initial surgery. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (ASA) is used for cases of osteoarthritis as well as for fractures of the humeral head. Hemiarthroplasty can be used for complex proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients that failed primary fracture hemiarthroplasty (FHA), or ASA for osteoarthritis and then required reoperation with a conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). METHODS: Patients with failed anatomic shoulder replacement, who had undergone conversion to RSA, were enrolled after a mean follow-up of 107 (85-157) months. Two different groups, one with failed ASA implanted for osteoarthritis and one with failed FHA, were created. At follow-up patients were assessed with standard radiographs and clinical outcome scores. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (f = 17, m = 12; 51%) suffered from a failed ASA (Group A), while the remaining 28 patients (f = 21, m = 74; 49%) had been revised due to a failed FHA (Group B). Patients of Group B had a poorer Constant score (Group A: 60 vs. Group B: 46; p = 0.02). Abduction (Group A: 115° vs. Group B: 89°; p = 0.02) was worse after conversion of a failed FHA to RSA in comparison to conversions of failed ASA. The mean bone loss of the lateral metaphysis was higher in patients with failed FHA (Group A: 5 mm vs. Group B: 20 mm; p = 0.0). CONCLUSION: The initial indication for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty influences the clinical and radiological outcome after conversion to RSA. Conversion of failed FHA to RSA is related to an increased metaphyseal bone loss, decreased range of motion and poorer clinical outcomes when compared to conversions of failed ASA implanted for osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Retrospective Cohort Comparison Study.

[Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty - Current Concepts]. / Inverse Schulterendoprothetik ­ aktueller Stand.

Due to first promising long term outcome data, reverse shoulder arthroplasty experienced an immense increase of usage during the past decade. Moreover, the initial Grammont concept has constantly been refined and adapted to current scientific findings. Therefore, clinical and radiological problems like scapular notching and postoperative instability were constantly addressed but do still remain an area of concern.This article summarises current concepts in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and gives an overview of actual indications like cuff tear arthropathy, severe osteoarthritis, proximal humerus fractures, tumours, fracture sequelae as well as revision surgery and their corresponding clinical and radiological results.

Results after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty with and without subscapularis repair: a prospective-randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasties (rTSA) have increased since their development by Paul Grammont in 1985. Prosthesis design was enhanced over time, but the management of the tendon of the M. subscapularis (SSC-tendon) in primary rTSA is still a controversial subject with regard to perform a refixation or not. METHODS: 50 patients were randomized in a refixation group (A) and a non-refixation-group (B) of the SSC-tendon in a double-blinded fashion. SSC-function was assessed at baseline before surgery, such as 3 and 12 months after surgery. Constant-Murley-Shoulder Score (CS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), strength, range of motion (ROM), and pain on numeric rating scale (NRS) were measured in all examinations. An ultrasound examination of the shoulder was performed for evaluation of subscapularis tendon integrity at 3 and 12 month follow-up visits. Pain was evaluated on NRS via phone 5 days after surgery. Surgery was performed by a single experienced senior surgeon in all patients. RESULTS: Patients with a refixation of the SSC-tendon and primary rTSA had improved internal rotation [40° (20°-60°) vs. 32° (20°-45°); p = 0.03] at 12 months of follow-up. Additionally, the A-group had increased CS [74 (13-90) vs. 69.5 (40-79); p = 0.029] 1 year after surgery. Results were strengthened by subgroup analysis of successful refixation in ultrasound examination vs. no refixation. No differences were seen in ASES and NRS 1 year after rTSA. CONCLUSION: SSC-tendon repair in rTSA improves CS and internal rotation 12 months after surgery.

Single-Portal Proximal Biceps Tenodesis Using an All-Suture Anchor.

The long head of the biceps is an important pain generator of the shoulder joint. Pathologies of the long head of the biceps involve superior labrum anterior to posterior lesions, pulley lesions, partial tears of the biceps tendon, biceps tendonitis, and medial biceps subluxation caused by full-thickness subscapularis tendon tears. Treatment of an inflamed or injured long head of the biceps by either tenotomy or tenodesis is often mandatory during shoulder arthroscopy to avoid persisting pain and possible revision procedures. In comparison with a tenotomy of the biceps tendon, a biceps tenodesis preserves the tension, anatomy, and cosmesis of the biceps muscle. The presented technique demonstrates a single portal technique for a proximal biceps tenodesis in the bicipital groove using an all-suture anchor.

Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?

INTRODUCTION: The employment of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for dislocated proximal humerus fractures of elderly patients becomes increasingly relevant. The standard inclination angle of the humeral component was 155°. Lately, there is a trend towards smaller inclination angles of 145° or 135°. Additionally, there has been an increased focus on the lateralization of the glenosphere. This retrospective comparative study evaluates clinical and radiological results of patients treated for proximal humerus fractures by reverse shoulder arthroplasty with different inclination angles of the humeral component, which was either 135° or 155°. Additionally, a different lateral offset of the glenosphere, which was either 0 mm or 4 mm, was used. METHODS: For this retrospective comparative analysis, 58 out of 66 patients treated by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures were included. The minimum follow-up was 24 months. Thirty (m = 3, f = 27; mean age 78 years; mean FU 35 months, range 24-58 months) were treated with a standard 155° humeral component and a glenosphere without lateral offset (group A), while 28 patients (m = 2, f = 26; mean age 79 years; mean FU 30 months, range 24-46 months) were treated with a 135° humeral component and a glenosphere with a 4 mm lateral offset (group B). We determined range of motion, Constant score, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score as clinical outcomes and evaluated tuberosity healing as well as scapula notching. RESULTS: Neither forward flexion (A = 128°, B = 121°; p = 0.710) nor abduction (A = 111°, B = 106°; p = 0.327) revealed differences between the groups. The mean Constant Score rated 63 in group A, while it was 61 in group B (p = 0.350). There were no differences of the ASES Score between the groups (A = 74, B = 72; p = 0.270). There was an increased risk for scapula notching in group A (47%) in comparison to group B (4%, p = 0.001). Healing of the greater tuberosity was achieved in 57% of group A and in 75% of group B (p = 0.142). The healing rate of the lesser tuberosity measured 33% in group A and 71% in group B (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Both inclination angles of the humeral component are feasible options for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Neither the inclination angle nor the lateral offset of the glenosphere seem to have a relevant influence on the clinical outcome. The healing rate of the lesser tuberosity was higher in implants with a decreased neck-shaft angle. There is an increased risk for scapula notching, if a higher inclination angle of the humeral component is chosen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Retrospective comparative study.

Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

PURPOSE: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is widely used for the treatment of cuff tear arthropathy. Standard implants consist of a humeral component with an inclination angle of 155° and a glenosphere without lateral offset. Recently, lower inclination angles of the humeral component as well as lateralized glenospheres are implanted to provide better rotation of the arm and to decrease the rate of scapular notching. This study investigates the clinical and radiological results of a standard reverse total shoulder in comparison with an implant with an inclination angle of 135° in combination with a 4 mm lateralized glenosphere in context of cuff tear arthropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For this retrospective comparative analysis 42 patients treated by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy were included. Twenty-one patients (m = 11, f = 10; mean age 76 years; mean follow-up 42 months) were treated with a standard 155° humeral component and a standard glenosphere with caudal eccentricity (group A), while twenty-one patients (m = 5, f = 16; mean age 72 years; mean follow-up 34 months) were treated with a 135° humeral component and 4 mm lateral offset of the glenosphere (group B). At follow-up patients of both groups were assessed with plain X-rays (a.p. and axial view), Constant Score, adjusted Constant Score, the subjective shoulder value and the range of motion. RESULTS: The clinical results were similar in both groups concerning the Constant Score (group A = 56.3 vs. group B = 56.1; p = 0.733), the adjusted CS (group A = 70.4% vs. group B = 68.3%; p = 0.589) and the SSV (group A = 72.0% vs. group B = 75.2%; p = 0.947). The range of motion of the operated shoulders did not differ significantly between group A and group B: Abduction = 98° versus 97.9°, p = 0.655; external rotation with the arm at side = 17.9° versus 18.7°, p = 0.703; external rotation with the arm positioned in 90° of abduction = 22.3° versus 24.7°, p = 0.524; forward flexion = 116.1° versus 116.7°, p = 0.760. The rate of scapular notching was higher (p = 0.013) in group A (overall: 66%, grade 1: 29%, grade 2: 29%, grade 3: 10%, grade 4: 0%) in comparison to group B (overall: 33%, grade 1: 33%, grade 2: 0%, grade 3: 0%, grade 4: 0%). Radiolucency around the humeral component was detected in two patients of group B. Stress shielding at the proximal humerus was observed in six patients of Group A (29%; cortical thinning and osteopenia in zone M1 and L1) and two patients of group B (10%; cortical thinning and osteopenia in zone M1 and L1). Calcifications of the triceps origin were observed in both groups (group A = 48% vs. group B = 38%). CONCLUSION: Theoretically, a lower inclination angle of the humeral component and an increased lateral offset of the glenosphere lead to improved impingement-free range of motion and a decreased rate of scapular notching, when compared to a standard reverse total shoulder implant. This study compared two different designs of numerous options concerning the humeral component and the glenosphere. In comparison to a standard-fashioned implant with a humeral inclination of 155° and a standard glenosphere, implants with a humeral inclination angle of 135° and a 4 mm lateralized glenosphere lead to comparable clinical results and rotatory function, while the rate of scapular notching is decreased by almost 50%. While the different implant designs did not affect the clinical outcome, our results indicate that a combination of a lower inclination angle of the humeral component and lateralized glenosphere should be favored to reduce scapular notching. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

[Arthroscopically-assisted treatment of acute and chronic dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint : A prospective clinical trial]. / Die arthroskopisch-assistierte Versorgung akuter und chronischer Sprengungen des Akromioklavikulargelenks : Eine prospektive Beobachtungsstudie.

BACKGROUND: Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) are frequent and often occur during sports. While arthroscopically-assisted stabilization of acute injuries of the ACJ is a well-established procedure, there is not much data available for arthroscopically-assisted stabilization of chronic injuries of the ACJ. OBJECTIVES: This study assesses clinical and radiological results of arthroscopically-assisted stabilization of acute and chronic injuries of the ACJ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with acute and chronic injuries of the ACJ were assessed in a prospective clinical trial. Twenty-five patients with acute injuries (group A) and eleven patients with chronic injuries (group B) were included in this study. Patients of group A were operated using two suture-button systems, while patients of group B received one suture-button system and an autologous gracilis tendon graft. RESULTS: In group A, the mean preoperative Constant score rated 38, and the ASES score rated 34. At follow-up the Constant score (92) and the ASES score (89) had improved. Panorama views revealed an increased coracoclavicular distance of the affected shoulder (15.8 mm) in comparison to the contralateral shoulder (10.9 mm). In group B, the preoperative Constant score measured 57. It improved to 72 points at follow-up. The ASES score improved from 39 to 72 points in the same period. Panorama views revealed an increased coracoclavicular distance of the affected shoulder (18.9 mm) in comparison to the contralateral shoulder (12.4 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Stabilization of acute injuries of the ACJ with two suture-button systems is related to very good shoulder function after one year. The native coracoclavicular distance cannot be restored with this procedure. Stabilization of chronic injuries of the ACJ with a suture-button system and an autologous gracilis tendon graft is related to improved shoulder function after one year. However, shoulder function cannot be fully restored with the stabilization technique presented.

Arthroscopic and open partial arthroplasty for the treatment of focal grade IV cartilage defects of the humeral head.

INTRODUCTION: Focal Outerbridge grade IV cartilage defects of the proximal humerus may lead to pain and an impaired shoulder function. In cases of failed operative or conservative treatment options such as intraarticular injections or arthroscopic microfracturing of the subchondral bone, partial arthroplasty of the humeral may restore the articular surface of the humeral head without altering the anatomy. This study evaluates mid-term results of open and arthroscopic partial resurfacing of the humeral head in the context of focal grade IV cartilage defects. METHODS: Eighteen patients (f = 3, m = 15, mean age = 57.7 years) out of 22 patients were available for follow-up after 65 (24-116) months. Thirteen patients were treated with a partial humeral head prosthesis in an open technique and five patients received a partial humeral head prosthesis in an arthroscopic technique. The patients were followed-up clinically using the Constant-Score, the ASES Score as well as the range of motion. Plain radiographs (anterior-posterior and axial view) were carried out for radiologic assessment. RESULTS: At follow-up the mean CS rated 79.5. The mean ASES Score was 85.8 points. Mean active forward flexion measured 163.8°, while mean active abduction was 160.0°. The average pain level on a visual analogue scale (VAS) made out 0.7 out of 10. Patients treated with an arthroscopically implanted prosthesis achieved a mean CS of 88.8 points and a mean ASES Score of 92.6 points. The patients with openly implanted prosthesis had a CS of 75.3 points and an ASES Score of 83 points. There were no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. Until the final follow-up one patient needed to be converted to total shoulder arthroplasty due to progressive glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Nine patients (50%) showed progressive glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Aseptic loosening of the implants was not observed. CONCLUSION: Partial arthroscopic or open arthroplasty of the humeral head is related to good functional results after mid-term follow-up. Resurfacing of the humeral head is a safe procedure without any implant-related complications. There is a risk for progression of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, which may require surgical revision with conversion to anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV (retrospective study).

A systematic review of tuberosity healing and outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture according to humeral inclination of the prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures are common in the elderly population and are often treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this systematic review was to compare tuberosity healing and functional outcomes in patients undergoing RSA with humeral inclinations of 135°, 145°, and 155°. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of RSA for proximal humerus fracture using Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Radiographic and functional outcome data were extracted to evaluate tuberosity healing according to humeral inclination. Analysis was also performed of healed vs. nonhealed tuberosities. RESULTS: A total of 873 patients in 21 studies were included in the analysis. The mean age was 77.5 years (range of 58-97) and the mean follow-up was 26.2 months. Tuberosity healing was 83% in the 135° group compared with 69% in the 145° group and 66% in the 155° group (P = .030). Postoperative abduction was highest in the 155° group (P < .001). No significant difference was found in forward flexion, external rotation, or postoperative Constant score between groups. Patients with tuberosity healing demonstrated 18° higher forward flexion (P = .008) and 16° greater external rotation (P < .001) than those with unhealed tuberosities. CONCLUSION: RSA for fracture with 135° humeral inclination is associated with higher tuberosity healing rates compared with 145° or 155°. Postoperative abduction is highest with a 155° implant, but there is no difference in in postoperative forward flexion, external rotation, or Constant score according to humeral inclination. Patients with healed tuberosities have superior postoperative forward flexion and external rotation than those with unhealed tuberosities.

Tuberosity healing improves functional outcome following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures with a 135° prosthesis.

INTRODUCTION: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a common treatment for proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) in the elderly. This study evaluates the influence of tuberosity healing (TH) on functional outcome following a 135° humeral inclination RSA for PHFs. METHODS: Retrospectively, all patients with an acute PHF treated with a 135° humeral inclination RSA at four centers during a three-year period were followed up. Constant score (CS), TH and glenoid notching were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-four of 100 patients (64%) with a mean age of 76 ± 7 years were available for follow-up at 22 ± 8 months. The mean-adjusted CS was 72%. TH of the greater tuberosity (GT) was 77% and resulted in significantly improved forward flexion (128° vs. 92°; p = 0.003), external rotation (33° vs. 17°; p = 0.03) and adjusted CS (78% vs. 54%, p < 0.005). GT healing rate was 86% with neutral, 70% with lateralized and 33% with an inferior eccentric glenosphere. TH of the lesser tuberosity was 79%. There was 8% complication and 3% revision rate; implant survival was 100%. CONCLUSION: RSA with 135° humeral inclination for PHFs leads to good functional outcome, reproducible results and a high rate of TH. The short-term revision rate is low. TH is associated with improved ROM and functional outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Traumatic Tear of the Latissimus Dorsi Tendon in a CrossFit Athlete: Surgical Management.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic tears of the latissimus dorsi tendon (LDT) are a rare sports injury that may occur during exercises involving horizontal and vertical pulling. A standardized treatment algorithm for this injury does not yet exist. CASE REPORT: A 30-year old male CrossFit Athlete experienced sudden unbearable pain in his right posterior shoulder during a bar muscle-up exercise. The contour of his right posterior shoulder had changed immediately, and the patient could not do any more exercises involving his right shoulder. BMagnet resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an isolated tear of the LDT. The repair of the tendon was performed using a posterior approach in the lateral decubitus position. After arming the tendon with non-absorbable sutures it was reinserted onto the crest of the lesser tuberosity of the proximal humerus with two monocortical suture buttons. Postoperatively, the patient was immobilized with an abduction pillow for 6 weeks. After 9 months he reported a 90% function of his shoulder. MRI showed complete anatomical reinsertion of the LDT. The patient was able to master 15 pull-ups in a row. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of the LDT may achieve good functional results as well as an acceptable recovery period.

All-Extra-articular Repair of Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.

Anterosuperior rotator cuff tears involve the subscapularis tendon, supraspinatus tendon, and rotator interval. The long head of the biceps is usually affected and unstable in these complex lesions. Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears often consists of 2 different procedures. Whereas the subscapularis tendon is reconstructed under intra-articular visualization, the supraspinatus tendon is reconstructed under extra-articular visualization. The rotator interval is often sacrificed to improve visualization and instrumentation. The presented technique uses an all-extra-articular approach, which helps to reconstruct these complex rotator cuff lesions in their whole extent without switching from the inside to the outside of the shoulder joint. The preservation of the rotator interval leads to a more stable and anatomic reconstruction.

Conversions from anatomic shoulder replacements to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the indications for initial surgery influence the clinical outcome after revision surgery?

INTRODUCTION: The most frequent indications for anatomic shoulder replacement are glenohumeral osteoarthritis and fractures of the humeral head. If anatomic shoulder prostheses fail, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is often the only remaining treatment option. This study evaluates the influence of indications for primary shoulder arthroplasty on the clinical outcome after conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2010 to 2012, 44 failed shoulder arthroplasties were converted to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Forty-four patients were available for follow-up after a mean of 24 months (14-36 months). Twenty-three of them had received an initial shoulder replacement because of osteoarthritis, while the remaining 21 patients had been treated for a fracture of the humeral head. At follow-up, patients were assessed with X-rays, constant-, and ASES scores. RESULTS: The total number of observed complications was higher in patients revised because of failed fracture arthroplasty (24 vs. 9%). Patients initially treated for osteoarthritis achieved a higher ASES score (71 vs. 59 points; p = 0.048). The normalized constant score was not different between the two observed groups (osteoarthritis 73% vs. fracture 67%: p = 0.45). Complications occurred more often in patients who had initially suffered from a fracture of the humeral head (fracture 23.8% vs. osteoarthritis 8.7%). Scapular notching was more frequent after initial fracture arthroplasty (33 vs. 14%). CONCLUSION: Indications for initial shoulder replacement have an influence on the clinical outcome after conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Patients initially treated for a fracture of the humeral head have a lower subjective outcome and a higher complication rate in comparison with patients initially treated for osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (Retrospective study).

Clinical and structural results of partial supraspinatus tears treated by subacromial decompression without repair.

Patients with primary impingement and articular sided partial tears of the supraspinatus are often treated by subacromial decompression without repair, if the extent of the tear is estimated to be below 50% of tendon thickness. It has been questioned whether repair of these cuff lesions is necessary, because these tears could progress to full thickness tears with deteriorating clinical results. Our hypothesis was that subacromial decompression without repair of the supraspinatus tendon leads to significant clinical improvement for patients with grade I and II articular sided tears without progression to a full thickness tear on a regular basis. 46 consecutive patients (av. Age 59.2 years, range 33-76.6 years) were retrospectively reviewed after an average follow up of 50.3 months (36-86 months). 26 patients (43.5%) had a grade I tear according to Ellman, which was left alone, 20 patients suffered from a grade II tear, which was debrided. Clinical outcome was assessed with the ASES Score and ultrasound evaluation was performed on all patients to detect possible progression to a full thickness tear. The average ASES Score significantly improved from 37.4 to 86.6 points (p < 0.0001). The mean postoperative Constant Score was 87.6 points. Only three patients (6.5%) progressed to a full thickness tear detectable on ultrasound examination. Only one of these patients had a poor result with an ASES Score of 35 points, the other two were very satisfied and had an ASES score above 90 points. 8 patients showed no more signs of partial tearing on ultrasound and these patients had an average ASES Score of 93.1 points. Overall clinical outcome was rated excellent in 35 cases (76.1%), good in 5 (10.9%), average in 2 (4.3%) and poor in 4 (8.7%). Our results indicate that good and excellent results can be achieved mid- to long term by acromioplasty without repair of the rotator cuff in articular sided partial tears grade I and II. These results reach almost 95% of the value of a healthy shoulder. A better result on ultrasound examination was associated with a superior clinical outcome, while progression to a full thickness tear was rare.

Arthroscopic debridement of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiologic results of arthroscopic debridement of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Thirty-one patients (mean age, 70.6 years) were retrospectively reviewed for a mean of 47 months (range, 24 to 69 months) after arthroscopic debridement of an irreparable rotator cuff tear. Operative treatment included biceps tenotomy in 24 cases (77.4%). No acromioplasty was performed to maintain the coracoacromial arch. Clinical outcome was assessed by use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant scores, as well as measurement of abduction strength and elbow flexion strength compared with the contralateral side at final follow-up. Preoperative and follow-up radiographs were evaluated for acromiohumeral distance and grade of osteoarthritis according to the Samilson-Prieto classification. RESULTS: The mean ASES score was significantly improved from 24.0 to 69.8 points at follow-up. Scores for pain were reduced from 7.8 to 2.9 points on a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10 points. The age- and gender-adjusted Constant score was 72.2%. Radiologic analysis showed progression of osteoarthritis in 10 cases (32.3%); this had no influence on the ASES score. Acromiohumeral distance decreased from 8.3 to 7.0 mm. Biceps strength was 6.1 kg on the operated side and 6.3 kg on the contralateral side. Abduction strength was significantly lower on the operated side at 2.6 kg versus 3.7 kg on the contralateral side. No complication related to the procedure was reported. CONCLUSIONS: For elderly patients with low functional demands, arthroscopic debridement in combination with biceps tenotomy is a safe procedure and leads to significant functional improvement without loss of biceps strength. Progression of osteoarthritic changes cannot be prevented, but no influence on the clinical result could be shown. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Outcome after failed traumatic anterior shoulder instability repair with and without surgical revision.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and reasons of recurrent instability in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability and to document the clinical results with regard to the number of stabilizing procedures. Twenty-four patients with failed primary open or arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization were followed for a mean of 68 (36-114) months. Following recurrence of shoulder instability, eight patients chose not to be operated on again, whereas 16 underwent repeat stabilization. A persistent or recurrent Bankart lesion was found in all 16 patients and concomitant capsular redundancy in 4. After the first revision surgery, further instability occurred in 8 patients, and 6 of them were stabilized a third time. Only 7 patients (29%) achieved a good or excellent result according to the Rowe score. All shoulder scores improved after revision stabilization. However, the number of stabilizing procedures adversely affected the outcome scores, as well as postoperative range of motion and patient satisfaction. Recurrent instability after a primary stabilization procedure represents a difficult diagnostic and surgical challenge, and careful attention should be paid to address persistent or recurrent Bankart lesions and concomitant capsular reduncancy. A satisfying functional outcome can be expected mainly in patients with one revision surgery. Further stabilization attempts are associated with poorer objective and subjective results.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair in traumatic anterior shoulder instability using a suture anchor technique.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the surgical outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair via suture anchors in patients with recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. METHODS: We included 54 consecutive patients without an osseous Bankart lesion of greater than 25% of the glenoid circumference with a mean age of 25.3 years (range, 16 to 58 years) undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair via suture anchors for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. The mean follow-up was 3.7 years (range, 2.3 to 5.2 years) at the final follow-up examination. Patients were evaluated prospectively according to the rating scales of Rowe, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Constant and Murley. One patient was lost to follow-up. RESULTS: After 3.7 years, 4 patients had recurrent instability: 3 had redislocated and 1 had recurrent subluxations. Thus the overall redislocation rate was 7.5%. Of the 4 redislocators, 3 had a traumatic onset of the redislocation. All shoulder scores (Rowe, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Constant and Murley) revealed highly significant improvements postoperatively. At final follow-up, 85.7% of patients had returned to their preoperative sports level. CONCLUSIONS: Our results in this series demonstrate the efficacy of arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors for the treatment of recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability with respect to recurrence rate, range of motion, and shoulder function during a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with a bioabsorbable tack.

BACKGROUND: Short-term to midterm data are available on arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using bioabsorbable tacks or suture anchors. It remains unknown whether these techniques can equal the success of open Bankart repair in the long term. PURPOSE: To assess the long-term outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair using bioabsorbable tacks in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Treatment outcomes were determined prospectively according to the Rowe score and retrospectively according to the Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Included in this study were 18 consecutive patients with a mean age of 26.8 years (range, 16-62 years) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair using bioabsorbable tacks for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. The study group consisted of 14 male and 4 female patients. The mean follow-up was 8.7 years (range, 7.0-9.8 years). RESULTS: One patient had recurrent dislocations requiring further surgery, for an overall failure rate of 5.6%. An additional patient had 1 traumatic subluxation episode within the first postoperative year that did not recur. According to the Rowe score, which increased to 90.3 (17.8) from 32.8 (8.3) points preoperatively, 15 patients (83.3%) achieved a good or excellent result. The mean Constant score was 91.3 (SD, 6.9) points, and the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 92.1 (SD, 6.9) points postoperatively. A return to the preinjury level of sports competition was reported by 64% of patients. No signs of synovitis occurred in any patient postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the treatment of recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability repair using bioabsorbable tacks offers reliable results with respect to failure rate, range of motion, and shoulder function during a minimum follow-up of 7.0 years. In contrast to previous reports on arthroscopic Bankart repair, results did not deteriorate during follow-up.

Quantitative assessment of glenohumeral translation after anterior shoulder dislocation and subsequent arthroscopic bankart repair.

BACKGROUND: During the past decade, developments in arthroscopic technology have made arthroscopic repair of labral lesions feasible. However, results with the use of the transglenoid suture technique, or with the use of bioabsorbable tacks, have remained variable in the literature, and the recurrence rates are still inferior to those of open Bankart repair. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors can re-create translational and rotational range of motion of the intact glenohumeral joint, and the number of preoperative dislocations has an influence on the result. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. MATERIALS: Twelve cadaveric shoulders were tested in a robot-assisted shoulder simulator. Anterior and posterior translation and external rotation were measured for intact, dislocated (shoulders were randomly selected to 1 of 3 groups, which were dislocated 1, 3, or 7 times), and repaired conditions at 0 degrees and 90 degrees of glenohumeral elevation. RESULTS: After shoulder dislocation, a significant increase was found in translation and rotation, confirming the creation of a traumatic shoulder instability model. Further testing of the specimen revealed that translational and rotational ranges of motion were reduced by arthroscopic Bankart repair at both testing positions. External rotation was decreased significantly at 0 degrees and 90 degrees of abduction. No significant differences were found between the 3 dislocation groups. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate a sufficient biomechanical performance of arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors in a traumatic anterior shoulder instability model. With the numbers available, no relationship was found between the number of dislocations and the postoperative result concerning translational or rotational motion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Glenohumeral translation and rotation after arthroscopic Bankart repair with use of suture anchors approached near normal values, confirming the clinical success of this technique.